The building of the UN International Court in The Hague. Hearings in the International Court: Sudan accuses the UAE of involvement in genocide acts International Law in the UN International Court on Thursday began hearings in the case of Sudan against the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Hartum accuses the UAE of complicity in the acts of genocide against the community of representatives of the people of Masabi in Western Darfur through the support of the militarized group “Fast Reding Forces”. 62 ~ hearings in the Hague are concentrated at the Sudan’s request to the main judicial authority of the UN to prevent further alleged serious violations of human rights. civilian War 60 > military government of Sudan claims that the UAE provides direct support for rapid response to the armed forces that have been conducting a fierce war with government forces since April 2023. 62 > 62 > 62 > 62 > 62 > 62 > 62 > 62 > 62 > 62 > 62 > 62 > 62 > 62 > 62 > 62 > 62 > 62 > 62 > 62The conflict caused one of the most severe humanitarian crises in the world, carried away tens of thousands of lives and forced more than 12.4 million people to leave their homes, of which more than 3.3 million became refugees in neighboring countries. ~ 60 >~ 60 > hunger reached a catastrophic level and destruction of vital services under the threat of life. millions of people, including hundreds of thousands of children. ~ 60 >~ 60 > case “Sudan v. UAE” 60 > judicial case is officially called “Application of the Convention on the prevention of the crime of genocide and punishment for it in the Sudan (Sudan against the United Arab Arabic Emiratov) ”and was initiated last month, when Sudan filed an application for initiation of the case against the UAE. ~ 60 >~ 60 > Official Hartum claims that the forces of quick response and their allies are responsible for serious human rights, including mass killings, rape and violent movement of the non -Arabian population from the non -Arab population the numbers of representatives of Masabi in Western Darfur. The lawsuit states that the UAE “participate in the Masalen genocide by leadership and providing significant financial, political and military support.” ~ 60 > 60 > until the final decision is made by Sudan, the court asks the court to establish temporary measures that oblige the UAE to prevent any actions ”, which may contribute to the genocide. ~ 60 > additionally Sudan requires the UAE to prevent the participation of any union irregular armed forces – directly or indirectly – in committing further alleged crimes. court has the authority in accordance Article 36 (1) of your statute to consider and make decisions on disputes arising from international law, including international treaties and conventions, if both parties recognize the jurisdiction of the court. ~ 60 >~ 60 > 60 ~/h2 ~ ~~ 60 > Convention on the prevention of crime Genocide and punishment for it were adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 9, 1948, shortly after the terrifying events of World War II. She entered into force on January 12, 1951. ~ 60 > Convention defines genocide as any act committed with the intention of destroying a fully or partially national, ethnic, racial or religious group. ~ ~ ours are participants in the Convention, which makes them legally obliged to observe its provisions.